Total Rating
2.8
out of 10
5.7
out of 10
Metabolic Health ⓘ
3
Limited evidence supports metabolic health benefits, with potential risks from nutrient absorption interference and lack of long-term biomarker improvements.
6
May marginally improve inflammation and nutrient density but lacks robust evidence for consistent metabolic health benefits.
Micronutrients ⓘ
2
Systematically lacks essential vitamins and minerals due to charcoal's nutrient-binding properties and absence of nutrient-dense food sources.
4
Lacks essential micronutrients like B12, vitamin D, and iodine without supplementation or fortification.
Nutrient Density ⓘ
2
Relies on calorie-dense, nutrient-poor activated charcoal and may impair nutrient absorption.
7
Offers moderate nutrient density with potential phytonutrient benefits but may lack variety and whole-food emphasis.
Overall Health ⓘ
2
Lacks essential nutrients, risks deficiencies, and has no evidence for long-term health benefits.
6
Offers marginal benefits in reducing pesticide exposure but lacks robust evidence for long-term disease prevention and nutritional adequacy compared to other dietary patterns.
Sustainability ⓘ
5
Limited by cost, accessibility, and lack of long-term adherence evidence.
5
Requires higher cost and limited accessibility, reducing long-term practicality and flexibility.
Lifestyle Fit ⓘ
4
Limited social flexibility and travel adaptability hinder practical integration into daily life.
6
Offers moderate flexibility in social and travel scenarios but requires careful planning and access to organic options, limiting spontaneity and convenience.
Practicality ⓘ
3
Requires specialized, costly, and geographically restricted ingredients with limited real-world feasibility.
5
Requires higher costs and limited accessibility compared to conventional diets, reducing long-term feasibility for most.
Appetite Control ⓘ
2
Lacks protein, fiber, and satiety-promoting nutrients, leading to increased hunger and poor long-term adherence.
7
Provides adequate protein and fiber but may struggle with glycemic stability and long-term satiety without careful planning.
Fat Quality ⓘ
2
Severely lacks essential unsaturated fats and omega-3s, with potential for harmful fat imbalances and poor long-term sustainability.
6
Provides moderate quality fats with some whole-food sources but lacks optimal omega-3 to omega-6 balance and may rely on processed organic foods.
Fiber Intake ⓘ
2
Provides negligible dietary fiber and lacks diverse, nutrient-dense sources critical for gut and metabolic health.
7
Provides adequate fiber quantity and diversity from whole organic foods but may lack specific emphasis on gut microbiome benefits.
Gut Health ⓘ
2
Severely lacks dietary fiber, prebiotics, and fermented foods, and may impair microbiome function and digestion.
7
Promotes fiber diversity and plant-based nutrient density but may lack fermented foods and prebiotic specificity.
Hormonal Support ⓘ
4
Limited micronutrient support and potential interference with hormone absorption may disrupt metabolic and endocrine functions.
6
Provides moderate nutrient density but lacks robust evidence on specific hormonal outcomes.
Macro Balance ⓘ
3
Lacks structured macronutrient distribution and evidence-based functional outcomes.
5
Lacks sufficient protein and may overly emphasize carbohydrates without clear evidence-based justification.
Protein Quality ⓘ
3
Relies on minimal, poorly digestible protein sources with potential absorption interference from activated charcoal.
5
Provides adequate protein quantity but lacks optimal amino acid balance and digestibility compared to animal-based sources.
Taste ⓘ
3
The diet's inherent bitterness and unappealing aftertaste significantly hinder meal enjoyment and long-term adherence.
6
Offers moderate flavor variety but lacks inherent taste superiority over non-organic diets.
Body Composition ⓘ
3
Likely promotes mild fat loss but risks significant lean mass loss due to low protein and nutrient deficiencies.
6
May support moderate fat loss but risks lean mass loss due to variable protein adequacy and reliance on plant-based sources.
Energy Balance ⓘ
2
Lacks structured calorie control, satiety support, and evidence for reliable energy management.
5
Limited structure for calorie control but may support satiety through fiber-rich organic foods.
Lean Mass ⓘ
2
Severely limits protein and energy intake, leading to significant muscle catabolism during caloric restriction.
6
Provides adequate protein but risks muscle loss if not meticulously planned with sufficient energy and amino acid balance.
Athletic Support ⓘ
2
Severely limits caloric intake, disrupts nutrient absorption, and impairs hydration and recovery.
6
Provides adequate nutrients for general athletic needs but may lack specific timing strategies and protein adequacy in strict plant-based versions.
Weight Loss ⓘ
2
Lacks robust evidence for sustained fat loss and may impair nutrient absorption, risking metabolic harm.
6
Provides moderate satiety from whole foods but lacks robust evidence for sustained fat loss compared to other structured diets.
To discover how we evaluate diets based on Overall Health, Nutrient Density, Practicality, Taste, and other critical parameters, Explore Our Comprehensive Ranking System and detailed methodology. This will help you make informed decisions tailored to your specific goals and needs.