Total Rating
4.3
out of 10
2.8
out of 10
Metabolic Health ⓘ
5
Limited evidence supports its impact on metabolic markers, with potential risks from restrictive nutrient profiles.
3
Limited evidence supports metabolic health benefits, with potential risks from nutrient absorption interference and lack of long-term biomarker improvements.
Micronutrients ⓘ
3
Fails to reliably meet essential micronutrient requirements without supplementation.
2
Systematically lacks essential vitamins and minerals due to charcoal's nutrient-binding properties and absence of nutrient-dense food sources.
Nutrient Density ⓘ
5
Limited phytonutrient diversity and reliance on low-calorie, minimally processed raw foods reduce nutrient density per calorie.
2
Relies on calorie-dense, nutrient-poor activated charcoal and may impair nutrient absorption.
Overall Health ⓘ
5
Limited nutritional adequacy and sustainability, with potential deficiencies and insufficient evidence for long-term health benefits.
2
Lacks essential nutrients, risks deficiencies, and has no evidence for long-term health benefits.
Sustainability ⓘ
3
Requires strict adherence to specific food combinations, limited flexibility, and may lead to social and psychological challenges.
5
Limited by cost, accessibility, and lack of long-term adherence evidence.
Lifestyle Fit ⓘ
4
Struggles with social integration, travel flexibility, and long-term sustainability due to strictness and limited adaptability.
4
Limited social flexibility and travel adaptability hinder practical integration into daily life.
Practicality ⓘ
4
Requires specific, often costly ingredients and complex preparation that limits real-world feasibility.
3
Requires specialized, costly, and geographically restricted ingredients with limited real-world feasibility.
Appetite Control ⓘ
5
Provides moderate protein and fiber but lacks robust evidence for sustained appetite suppression or long-term satiety.
2
Lacks protein, fiber, and satiety-promoting nutrients, leading to increased hunger and poor long-term adherence.
Fat Quality ⓘ
5
Relies heavily on ALA omega-3s with limited EPA/DHA, risking omega-3 to omega-6 imbalance and suboptimal cardiovascular and cognitive benefits.
2
Severely lacks essential unsaturated fats and omega-3s, with potential for harmful fat imbalances and poor long-term sustainability.
Fiber Intake ⓘ
7
Provides adequate fiber quantity but limited diversity and evidence-based health outcomes.
2
Provides negligible dietary fiber and lacks diverse, nutrient-dense sources critical for gut and metabolic health.
Gut Health ⓘ
5
Limited fiber diversity and potential digestive challenges reduce its effectiveness for gut microbiome support.
2
Severely lacks dietary fiber, prebiotics, and fermented foods, and may impair microbiome function and digestion.
Hormonal Support ⓘ
5
Provides some fat and protein for hormone synthesis but lacks robust evidence on hormonal outcomes and may risk deficiencies in key micronutrients.
4
Limited micronutrient support and potential interference with hormone absorption may disrupt metabolic and endocrine functions.
Macro Balance ⓘ
4
Relies on restrictive, unbalanced macronutrient ratios with insufficient protein and rigid structure, lacking evidence for functional outcomes.
3
Lacks structured macronutrient distribution and evidence-based functional outcomes.
Protein Quality ⓘ
5
Limited by incomplete amino acid profiles and lower digestibility of plant-based sources.
3
Relies on minimal, poorly digestible protein sources with potential absorption interference from activated charcoal.
Taste ⓘ
3
Limited flavor variety and restrictive nature reduce overall enjoyment and adherence potential.
3
The diet's inherent bitterness and unappealing aftertaste significantly hinder meal enjoyment and long-term adherence.
Body Composition ⓘ
4
Limited protein intake and restrictive nature may impair lean mass preservation during fat loss.
3
Likely promotes mild fat loss but risks significant lean mass loss due to low protein and nutrient deficiencies.
Energy Balance ⓘ
4
Limited flexibility for calorie adjustment and potential for under-eating without structured guidance.
2
Lacks structured calorie control, satiety support, and evidence for reliable energy management.
Lean Mass ⓘ
4
Limited protein quality and adequacy may hinder muscle preservation during caloric restriction.
2
Severely limits protein and energy intake, leading to significant muscle catabolism during caloric restriction.
Athletic Support ⓘ
4
Limited macronutrient balance and potential micronutrient deficiencies hinder athletic performance and recovery.
2
Severely limits caloric intake, disrupts nutrient absorption, and impairs hydration and recovery.
Weight Loss ⓘ
4
Limited scientific evidence supports sustained fat loss without significant adherence challenges or metabolic risks.
2
Lacks robust evidence for sustained fat loss and may impair nutrient absorption, risking metabolic harm.
To discover how we evaluate diets based on Overall Health, Nutrient Density, Practicality, Taste, and other critical parameters, Explore Our Comprehensive Ranking System and detailed methodology. This will help you make informed decisions tailored to your specific goals and needs.