Total Rating
4.1
out of 10
2.8
out of 10
Metabolic Health ⓘ
5
Limited evidence supports metabolic improvements, but potential benefits from polyphenols are offset by lack of comprehensive research and possible nutrient imbalances.
3
Limited evidence supports metabolic health benefits, with potential risks from nutrient absorption interference and lack of long-term biomarker improvements.
Micronutrients ⓘ
3
Relies heavily on limited food sources, risking deficiencies in B12, vitamin D, and other critical nutrients without fortification or supplementation.
2
Systematically lacks essential vitamins and minerals due to charcoal's nutrient-binding properties and absence of nutrient-dense food sources.
Nutrient Density ⓘ
5
Limited phytonutrient diversity and potential nutrient gaps despite some antioxidant benefits.
2
Relies on calorie-dense, nutrient-poor activated charcoal and may impair nutrient absorption.
Overall Health ⓘ
3
Severely restricts essential nutrients and lacks robust evidence for long-term health benefits.
2
Lacks essential nutrients, risks deficiencies, and has no evidence for long-term health benefits.
Sustainability ⓘ
3
Requires restrictive food choices and lacks flexibility, making long-term adherence difficult.
5
Limited by cost, accessibility, and lack of long-term adherence evidence.
Lifestyle Fit ⓘ
5
Limited social flexibility and travel adaptability hinder real-world adherence.
4
Limited social flexibility and travel adaptability hinder practical integration into daily life.
Practicality ⓘ
5
Requires significant dietary restriction and limited variety, making long-term adherence challenging despite accessible and affordable grapes.
3
Requires specialized, costly, and geographically restricted ingredients with limited real-world feasibility.
Appetite Control ⓘ
5
Limited protein and fiber content may lead to hunger, but low energy density could support satiety.
2
Lacks protein, fiber, and satiety-promoting nutrients, leading to increased hunger and poor long-term adherence.
Fat Quality ⓘ
4
Lacks sufficient healthy fats and has an imbalanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.
2
Severely lacks essential unsaturated fats and omega-3s, with potential for harmful fat imbalances and poor long-term sustainability.
Fiber Intake ⓘ
3
Relies on low-fiber fruits with limited diversity and fails to meet recommended fiber intake for optimal gut and metabolic health.
2
Provides negligible dietary fiber and lacks diverse, nutrient-dense sources critical for gut and metabolic health.
Gut Health ⓘ
4
Limited fiber diversity and potential digestive discomfort due to high sugar content reduce its effectiveness for gut health.
2
Severely lacks dietary fiber, prebiotics, and fermented foods, and may impair microbiome function and digestion.
Hormonal Support ⓘ
6
Provides moderate support for insulin regulation and satiety but may lack sufficient micronutrients and risk cortisol elevation with strict calorie restriction.
4
Limited micronutrient support and potential interference with hormone absorption may disrupt metabolic and endocrine functions.
Macro Balance ⓘ
6
Provides moderate protein and fat but lacks adaptability and clear evidence for optimal macro ratios.
3
Lacks structured macronutrient distribution and evidence-based functional outcomes.
Protein Quality ⓘ
3
Relies on low-protein, incomplete plant sources with insufficient amino acids and poor digestibility.
3
Relies on minimal, poorly digestible protein sources with potential absorption interference from activated charcoal.
Taste ⓘ
6
Offers moderate flavor and satiety but limited variety and adaptability.
3
The diet's inherent bitterness and unappealing aftertaste significantly hinder meal enjoyment and long-term adherence.
Body Composition ⓘ
4
Limited protein intake and insufficient evidence for fat loss while preserving lean mass.
3
Likely promotes mild fat loss but risks significant lean mass loss due to low protein and nutrient deficiencies.
Energy Balance ⓘ
4
Limited structure for calorie control and variable satiety impact due to high sugar content and lack of clear portion guidance.
2
Lacks structured calorie control, satiety support, and evidence for reliable energy management.
Lean Mass ⓘ
3
Severely limits protein and energy intake, risking significant lean mass loss during calorie restriction.
2
Severely limits protein and energy intake, leading to significant muscle catabolism during caloric restriction.
Athletic Support ⓘ
5
Limited macronutrient variety and potential micronutrient deficiencies may hinder sustained athletic performance and recovery.
2
Severely limits caloric intake, disrupts nutrient absorption, and impairs hydration and recovery.
Weight Loss ⓘ
5
Limited evidence supports sustained fat loss, with potential for short-term calorie deficit but questionable long-term sustainability and metabolic effects.
2
Lacks robust evidence for sustained fat loss and may impair nutrient absorption, risking metabolic harm.
To discover how we evaluate diets based on Overall Health, Nutrient Density, Practicality, Taste, and other critical parameters, Explore Our Comprehensive Ranking System and detailed methodology. This will help you make informed decisions tailored to your specific goals and needs.