Total Rating
3.2
out of 10
6.4
out of 10
Metabolic Health ⓘ
3
Likely contributes to insulin resistance and dyslipidemia due to high saturated fat and processed meat content, with limited evidence supporting metabolic benefits.
7
Improves insulin sensitivity and lipid profiles but shows variable effects on inflammation and long-term metabolic sustainability.
Micronutrients ⓘ
3
Lacks essential micronutrients like vitamin D, iodine, and calcium, leading to significant deficiency risks.
5
May lead to chronic deficiencies in B12, iron, and other nutrients if not paired with nutrient-dense foods.
Nutrient Density ⓘ
4
Limited phytonutrient diversity and reliance on calorie-dense animal protein with minimal plant-based nutrient contributions.
6
Provides moderate nutrient density when paired with whole foods but lacks inherent diversity and bioavailability optimization compared to plant-based diets.
Overall Health ⓘ
3
High saturated fat content from lamb and limited nutrient diversity pose significant long-term health risks.
7
Offers moderate benefits for metabolic health and disease prevention but lacks comprehensive long-term evidence across diverse populations.
Sustainability ⓘ
2
Severely restricts dietary variety and practicality, leading to poor long-term adherence and sustainability.
7
Offers moderate flexibility and accessibility but may challenge adherence due to fasting periods and potential social or psychological stress.
Lifestyle Fit ⓘ
2
Severely limits social engagement, travel adaptability, and daily routine integration due to extreme food restrictions.
7
Offers moderate flexibility for social and travel scenarios but requires careful scheduling to align with daily routines.
Practicality ⓘ
3
Relies on costly and less accessible ingredients with limited meal variety and preparation flexibility.
8
Offers flexible meal timing without requiring specialized foods, equipment, or complex planning, making it broadly accessible and adaptable to most lifestyles.
Appetite Control ⓘ
5
Provides moderate protein and fiber but relies on energy-dense meat and may trigger glycemic spikes from pineapple.
7
Moderately effective in reducing hunger through fasting-induced hormonal changes but depends on nutrient balance and individual adherence.
Fat Quality ⓘ
3
Relies heavily on saturated fats from lamb with minimal unsaturated fats and lacks essential omega-3s.
7
Encourages mindful eating but depends on individual fat choices for optimal quality.
Fiber Intake ⓘ
2
Severely deficient in diverse, nutrient-dense fiber sources, failing to meet basic dietary fiber requirements.
5
Provides variable fiber intake depending on eating window choices, often lacking sufficient diversity and nutrient density.
Gut Health ⓘ
3
Limited fiber and prebiotic content, potential for digestive discomfort, and lack of microbiome diversity support.
5
Limited support for gut microbiome diversity and digestive tolerance, with mixed evidence on long-term benefits.
Hormonal Support ⓘ
4
Limited micronutrient diversity and potential hormonal imbalances due to restrictive composition.
6
Moderately supports insulin sensitivity and appetite regulation but may disrupt cortisol and sex hormones with improper implementation.
Macro Balance ⓘ
5
Limited evidence-based macronutrient distribution with potential imbalances and restricted adaptability.
6
Allows adaptable macro ratios but lacks inherent structure to ensure balanced intake across diverse dietary needs.
Protein Quality ⓘ
6
Relies on incomplete protein sources with limited amino acid balance and poor digestibility from pineapple.
5
Provides adequate protein sufficiency but relies on incomplete plant sources with lower digestibility and amino acid balance.
Taste ⓘ
5
Limited variety and potential monotony due to reliance on specific proteins and fruits, though the combination may offer some flavorful contrast.
6
Offers flexibility for flavorful meals but lacks inherent structure to ensure consistent palatability or variety.
Body Composition ⓘ
5
Limited protein quality and potential nutrient imbalance may hinder lean mass preservation and fat loss efficiency.
7
Effectively supports fat loss while preserving lean mass when protein and training are optimized, but risks muscle loss without strict adherence to nutrient intake and resistance exercise.
Energy Balance ⓘ
2
Severely restricts food variety and lacks mechanisms for sustainable calorie control or satiety regulation.
7
Moderately effective for calorie control but lacks inherent structure to ensure consistent energy balance without external guidance.
Lean Mass ⓘ
4
Limited protein quality and potential energy deficits risk muscle catabolism.
6
Moderate effectiveness in preserving lean mass when protein intake and energy availability are adequately managed during fasting periods.
Athletic Support ⓘ
3
Limited macronutrient diversity and potential micronutrient deficiencies hinder athletic performance and recovery.
6
May support athletic performance if calorie and nutrient needs are met, but risks underfueling and impaired recovery without careful planning.
Weight Loss ⓘ
3
Limited calorie deficit potential and high saturated fat content may hinder sustainable fat loss and metabolic health.
7
Promotes moderate calorie deficit and fat loss with reasonable sustainability but risks metabolic adaptation and variable long-term adherence.
To discover how we evaluate diets based on Overall Health, Nutrient Density, Practicality, Taste, and other critical parameters, Explore Our Comprehensive Ranking System and detailed methodology. This will help you make informed decisions tailored to your specific goals and needs.