Total Rating
4.9
out of 10
2.8
out of 10
Metabolic Health ⓘ
5
Limited evidence supports specific metabolic benefits, with potential for nutritional gaps and insufficient research on long-term cardiometabolic outcomes.
3
Limited evidence supports metabolic health benefits, with potential risks from nutrient absorption interference and lack of long-term biomarker improvements.
Micronutrients ⓘ
3
Severely lacks essential vitamins like B12 and minerals like iodine, risking chronic deficiencies without supplementation.
2
Systematically lacks essential vitamins and minerals due to charcoal's nutrient-binding properties and absence of nutrient-dense food sources.
Nutrient Density ⓘ
6
Provides moderate nutrient density per calorie but lacks phytonutrient diversity and essential micronutrients from other food groups.
2
Relies on calorie-dense, nutrient-poor activated charcoal and may impair nutrient absorption.
Overall Health ⓘ
6
Provides some nutrient density but risks deficiencies in B12, iron, and omega-3s without supplementation.
2
Lacks essential nutrients, risks deficiencies, and has no evidence for long-term health benefits.
Sustainability ⓘ
4
Relies heavily on a single food group, limiting flexibility and long-term adherence due to monotony and potential nutrient gaps.
5
Limited by cost, accessibility, and lack of long-term adherence evidence.
Lifestyle Fit ⓘ
4
Limited social flexibility and strictness hinder real-world adaptability and adherence.
4
Limited social flexibility and travel adaptability hinder practical integration into daily life.
Practicality ⓘ
7
Offers moderate affordability and accessibility but requires specific mushroom variety focus, increasing complexity in meal planning and preparation.
3
Requires specialized, costly, and geographically restricted ingredients with limited real-world feasibility.
Appetite Control ⓘ
6
Provides moderate satiety via fiber and protein but may lack sufficient protein and variety to consistently suppress hunger.
2
Lacks protein, fiber, and satiety-promoting nutrients, leading to increased hunger and poor long-term adherence.
Fat Quality ⓘ
5
Limited emphasis on high-quality omega-3 sources and insufficient unsaturated fats from whole-foods.
2
Severely lacks essential unsaturated fats and omega-3s, with potential for harmful fat imbalances and poor long-term sustainability.
Fiber Intake ⓘ
6
Provides moderate fiber quantity but lacks diversity in fiber types and nutrient density.
2
Provides negligible dietary fiber and lacks diverse, nutrient-dense sources critical for gut and metabolic health.
Gut Health ⓘ
4
Limited fiber diversity and potential digestive discomfort reduce its effectiveness for gut microbiome support.
2
Severely lacks dietary fiber, prebiotics, and fermented foods, and may impair microbiome function and digestion.
Hormonal Support ⓘ
5
Limited micronutrient density and potential deficiencies in fat/specific vitamins may hinder hormonal balance.
4
Limited micronutrient support and potential interference with hormone absorption may disrupt metabolic and endocrine functions.
Macro Balance ⓘ
5
Relies on low-protein, low-fat structure with limited adaptability for diverse health goals.
3
Lacks structured macronutrient distribution and evidence-based functional outcomes.
Protein Quality ⓘ
4
Relies on incomplete protein sources with insufficient leucine and amino acid balance for optimal muscle recovery.
3
Relies on minimal, poorly digestible protein sources with potential absorption interference from activated charcoal.
Taste ⓘ
5
Limited flavor variety and potential monotony may hinder long-term adherence without creative culinary adaptations.
3
The diet's inherent bitterness and unappealing aftertaste significantly hinder meal enjoyment and long-term adherence.
Body Composition ⓘ
5
Limited protein adequacy risks lean mass loss during fat reduction.
3
Likely promotes mild fat loss but risks significant lean mass loss due to low protein and nutrient deficiencies.
Energy Balance ⓘ
5
Limited structure for calorie control but may support satiety through high fiber and water content.
2
Lacks structured calorie control, satiety support, and evidence for reliable energy management.
Lean Mass ⓘ
3
Limited protein intake and potential energy deficits risk significant muscle loss during caloric restriction.
2
Severely limits protein and energy intake, leading to significant muscle catabolism during caloric restriction.
Athletic Support ⓘ
5
Provides adequate nutrients but risks underfueling and imbalanced macronutrients without careful planning.
2
Severely limits caloric intake, disrupts nutrient absorption, and impairs hydration and recovery.
Weight Loss ⓘ
5
Limited evidence supports sustained fat loss, with potential for calorie deficit but lacking robust long-term studies on metabolic and fat-specific outcomes.
2
Lacks robust evidence for sustained fat loss and may impair nutrient absorption, risking metabolic harm.
To discover how we evaluate diets based on Overall Health, Nutrient Density, Practicality, Taste, and other critical parameters, Explore Our Comprehensive Ranking System and detailed methodology. This will help you make informed decisions tailored to your specific goals and needs.