Total Rating
5.5
out of 10
2.8
out of 10
Metabolic Health ⓘ
6
Offers potential for personalized metabolic improvements but lacks consistent, robust evidence across all metabolic health markers.
3
Limited evidence supports metabolic health benefits, with potential risks from nutrient absorption interference and lack of long-term biomarker improvements.
Micronutrients ⓘ
4
Lacks critical micronutrients like B12 and vitamin D without supplementation, risking deficiencies.
2
Systematically lacks essential vitamins and minerals due to charcoal's nutrient-binding properties and absence of nutrient-dense food sources.
Nutrient Density ⓘ
6
Provides moderate phytonutrient diversity but risks nutrient imbalance and relies on processed foods in strict plant-based formulations.
2
Relies on calorie-dense, nutrient-poor activated charcoal and may impair nutrient absorption.
Overall Health ⓘ
6
Limited evidence supports long-term health benefits despite potential for personalized nutrient optimization.
2
Lacks essential nutrients, risks deficiencies, and has no evidence for long-term health benefits.
Sustainability ⓘ
6
Offers personalized flexibility but lacks robust long-term adherence evidence and may involve accessibility barriers.
5
Limited by cost, accessibility, and lack of long-term adherence evidence.
Lifestyle Fit ⓘ
5
Requires significant planning and may limit social flexibility without tailored adjustments.
4
Limited social flexibility and travel adaptability hinder practical integration into daily life.
Practicality ⓘ
5
Requires specialized testing and may involve restrictive dietary choices with limited real-world accessibility and affordability.
3
Requires specialized, costly, and geographically restricted ingredients with limited real-world feasibility.
Appetite Control ⓘ
7
Offers tailored nutrient strategies that can enhance satiety but lacks robust, consistent evidence on appetite suppression compared to other diets.
2
Lacks protein, fiber, and satiety-promoting nutrients, leading to increased hunger and poor long-term adherence.
Fat Quality ⓘ
5
Limited omega-3 adequacy and reliance on ALA without EPA/DHA restricts cardiovascular and neurological benefits.
2
Severely lacks essential unsaturated fats and omega-3s, with potential for harmful fat imbalances and poor long-term sustainability.
Fiber Intake ⓘ
7
Provides adequate fiber quantity but may lack diversity and practical tolerance for some individuals.
2
Provides negligible dietary fiber and lacks diverse, nutrient-dense sources critical for gut and metabolic health.
Gut Health ⓘ
6
Supports microbiome diversity through fiber but may lack fermented foods and cause digestive discomfort in some individuals.
2
Severely lacks dietary fiber, prebiotics, and fermented foods, and may impair microbiome function and digestion.
Hormonal Support ⓘ
5
Limited hormonal support due to potential micronutrient deficiencies and risks of extreme restriction in strict plant-based frameworks.
4
Limited micronutrient support and potential interference with hormone absorption may disrupt metabolic and endocrine functions.
Macro Balance ⓘ
6
Provides some adaptability but lacks consistent evidence for optimal macro ratios across diverse populations.
3
Lacks structured macronutrient distribution and evidence-based functional outcomes.
Protein Quality ⓘ
5
Provides adequate protein quantity but may lack optimal amino acid balance and digestibility compared to animal-based sources.
3
Relies on minimal, poorly digestible protein sources with potential absorption interference from activated charcoal.
Taste ⓘ
5
Limited variety and potential monotony in restrictive dietary applications may hinder long-term adherence.
3
The diet's inherent bitterness and unappealing aftertaste significantly hinder meal enjoyment and long-term adherence.
Body Composition ⓘ
4
Limited evidence supports consistent improvements in fat-to-muscle ratio with current nutrigenomic interventions.
3
Likely promotes mild fat loss but risks significant lean mass loss due to low protein and nutrient deficiencies.
Energy Balance ⓘ
4
Limited evidence supports reliable calorie control and satiety regulation in personalized genetic diets.
2
Lacks structured calorie control, satiety support, and evidence for reliable energy management.
Lean Mass ⓘ
6
Limited evidence supports lean mass preservation without clear protein adequacy or energy balance.
2
Severely limits protein and energy intake, leading to significant muscle catabolism during caloric restriction.
Athletic Support ⓘ
5
Limited evidence supports optimal energy, recovery, and macronutrient balance for athletic performance.
2
Severely limits caloric intake, disrupts nutrient absorption, and impairs hydration and recovery.
Weight Loss ⓘ
5
Limited evidence supports sustained fat loss without significant metabolic or adherence challenges.
2
Lacks robust evidence for sustained fat loss and may impair nutrient absorption, risking metabolic harm.
To discover how we evaluate diets based on Overall Health, Nutrient Density, Practicality, Taste, and other critical parameters, Explore Our Comprehensive Ranking System and detailed methodology. This will help you make informed decisions tailored to your specific goals and needs.