Total Rating
5.7
out of 10
5.5
out of 10
Metabolic Health ⓘ
6
May marginally improve inflammation and nutrient density but lacks robust evidence for consistent metabolic health benefits.
6
Limited evidence supports specific metabolic benefits, but aligns with general plant-based advantages.
Micronutrients ⓘ
4
Lacks essential micronutrients like B12, vitamin D, and iodine without supplementation or fortification.
4
Likely to cause deficiencies in B12, D, iodine, and iron due to exclusion of animal products and bioavailability challenges.
Nutrient Density ⓘ
7
Offers moderate nutrient density with potential phytonutrient benefits but may lack variety and whole-food emphasis.
7
Focuses on nutrient-rich plant foods but may lack variety in phytonutrient diversity and bioavailability optimization.
Overall Health ⓘ
6
Offers marginal benefits in reducing pesticide exposure but lacks robust evidence for long-term disease prevention and nutritional adequacy compared to other dietary patterns.
6
Limited nutritional adequacy and lack of robust evidence for disease prevention despite potential benefits from plant-based components.
Sustainability ⓘ
5
Requires higher cost and limited accessibility, reducing long-term practicality and flexibility.
5
Moderate sustainability due to restrictive food choices and limited flexibility, which may reduce long-term adherence and practicality.
Lifestyle Fit ⓘ
6
Offers moderate flexibility in social and travel scenarios but requires careful planning and access to organic options, limiting spontaneity and convenience.
5
Limited flexibility in social settings and travel, requiring significant planning and dietary restrictions.
Practicality ⓘ
5
Requires higher costs and limited accessibility compared to conventional diets, reducing long-term feasibility for most.
6
Requires moderate effort and cost for fresh produce, but lacks widespread accessibility and simplicity compared to standard balanced diets.
Appetite Control ⓘ
7
Provides adequate protein and fiber but may struggle with glycemic stability and long-term satiety without careful planning.
6
Offers moderate satiety through fiber and volume but risks cravings and overeating due to restrictive nature and variable protein adequacy.
Fat Quality ⓘ
6
Provides moderate quality fats with some whole-food sources but lacks optimal omega-3 to omega-6 balance and may rely on processed organic foods.
5
Relies heavily on ALA without EPA/DHA, leading to suboptimal omega-3 status and potential omega-6 imbalance.
Fiber Intake ⓘ
7
Provides adequate fiber quantity and diversity from whole organic foods but may lack specific emphasis on gut microbiome benefits.
7
Provides adequate fiber quantity from plant foods but may lack diversity in fiber types and practicality for long-term adherence.
Gut Health ⓘ
7
Promotes fiber diversity and plant-based nutrient density but may lack fermented foods and prebiotic specificity.
6
Provides moderate fiber and plant diversity but lacks fermented foods and may restrict nutrient variety.
Hormonal Support ⓘ
6
Provides moderate nutrient density but lacks robust evidence on specific hormonal outcomes.
5
Limited micronutrient diversity and potential deficiencies in fat-soluble vitamins may hinder hormonal balance.
Macro Balance ⓘ
5
Lacks sufficient protein and may overly emphasize carbohydrates without clear evidence-based justification.
5
Limited flexibility in macronutrient ratios with potential deficiencies in protein and fat, and lacks evidence-based adaptability for diverse goals.
Protein Quality ⓘ
5
Provides adequate protein quantity but lacks optimal amino acid balance and digestibility compared to animal-based sources.
5
Limited by incomplete amino acid profiles and lower digestibility of plant-based sources without strategic complementation.
Taste ⓘ
6
Offers moderate flavor variety but lacks inherent taste superiority over non-organic diets.
5
Offers moderate flavor variety with fruits and vegetables but risks monotony and limited adaptability due to restrictive food choices.
Body Composition ⓘ
6
May support moderate fat loss but risks lean mass loss due to variable protein adequacy and reliance on plant-based sources.
5
Limited evidence supports fat loss without significant lean mass loss due to potential protein inadequacy and lack of targeted body composition research.
Energy Balance ⓘ
5
Limited structure for calorie control but may support satiety through fiber-rich organic foods.
5
Limited calorie control mechanisms and rigid food restrictions hinder reliable energy management.
Lean Mass ⓘ
6
Provides adequate protein but risks muscle loss if not meticulously planned with sufficient energy and amino acid balance.
4
Limited protein quality and potential energy deficits hinder muscle preservation.
Athletic Support ⓘ
6
Provides adequate nutrients for general athletic needs but may lack specific timing strategies and protein adequacy in strict plant-based versions.
5
Limited macronutrient adequacy and potential nutrient deficiencies may hinder performance and recovery.
Weight Loss ⓘ
6
Provides moderate satiety from whole foods but lacks robust evidence for sustained fat loss compared to other structured diets.
5
Limited evidence supports sustained fat loss without significant adherence challenges or metabolic drawbacks.
To discover how we evaluate diets based on Overall Health, Nutrient Density, Practicality, Taste, and other critical parameters, Explore Our Comprehensive Ranking System and detailed methodology. This will help you make informed decisions tailored to your specific goals and needs.