Total Rating
1.0
out of 10
6.8
out of 10
Metabolic Health ⓘ
1
Severe calorie restriction and parasitic consumption disrupt metabolic homeostasis, elevate inflammation, and compromise cardiometabolic function.
7
Offers moderate improvements in blood sugar and lipid markers but lacks robust evidence for sustained metabolic benefits compared to other dietary patterns.
Micronutrients ⓘ
1
Relies on parasitic consumption leading to systemic micronutrient deficiencies and severe health risks.
7
Provides adequate micronutrient coverage on non-fasting days but risks deficiencies on fasting days without careful planning.
Nutrient Density ⓘ
1
Relies on a parasitic organism with negligible nutrient density and no beneficial phytonutrients.
6
Offers moderate nutrient density with potential for improvement through whole foods and phytonutrient variety.
Overall Health ⓘ
1
Poses severe health risks, including parasitic infection and malnutrition, with no credible evidence supporting long-term wellness.
7
Offers moderate benefits for metabolic health and disease risk reduction but lacks robust long-term population data and may pose nutrient gaps if not carefully managed.
Sustainability ⓘ
1
It is biologically unsustainable, ethically indefensible, and practically unfeasible for long-term adherence.
7
Offers moderate flexibility and practicality but may challenge adherence due to fasting days and potential psychological stress.
Lifestyle Fit ⓘ
1
Causes severe social isolation, impracticality, and health risks incompatible with real-world lifestyles.
7
Offers moderate flexibility for social and travel scenarios but requires planning for fasting days.
Practicality ⓘ
1
Requires consumption of non-typical, inaccessible, and dangerous organisms with no real-world feasibility.
8
Offers flexibility with minimal cost, accessibility, and preparation effort while allowing normal eating on most days.
Appetite Control ⓘ
1
Relies on parasitic consumption, lacks essential nutrients, and induces chronic hunger with no sustainable satiety mechanisms.
7
Balances satiety through moderate protein and fiber intake but may struggle with hunger management on restricted days without careful food choices.
Fat Quality ⓘ
1
Relies on parasitic consumption and lacks essential healthy fats, promoting harmful fat intake.
6
Provides moderate emphasis on healthy fats but lacks structured guidance on omega-3 balance and saturated fat sources.
Fiber Intake ⓘ
1
Provides negligible fiber and prioritizes harmful parasitic consumption over nutritional benefits.
6
Provides variable fiber intake depending on non-fasting day choices, but lacks structured fiber optimization.
Gut Health ⓘ
1
Severely compromises gut health through pathogenic risks, nutrient deficiencies, and lack of microbiome-supporting components.
5
Limited support for gut microbiome diversity and digestive health due to restricted fiber and lack of prebiotic/fermented food emphasis.
Hormonal Support ⓘ
1
It is a harmful, unscientific diet that disrupts hormonal balance through extreme caloric restriction and nutrient deficiencies.
7
Moderately supports hormonal balance with intermittent fasting benefits but may elevate cortisol in some individuals.
Macro Balance ⓘ
1
It promotes severe nutritional deficiencies, health risks, and lacks functional macronutrient balance.
7
Offers flexibility for macro adjustment but lacks structured guidance on optimal ratios for most individuals.
Protein Quality ⓘ
1
Provides negligible high-quality protein with severe health risks and inadequate amino acid balance.
6
Provides adequate protein on non-fasting days but risks insufficiency on restricted days without deliberate intake management.
Taste ⓘ
1
The diet involves consuming a parasite with a strong, unpalatable taste and texture, leading to severe dissatisfaction and poor adherence.
7
Offers moderate variety and adaptability but requires careful meal planning to maintain palatability on restricted days.
Body Composition ⓘ
1
It causes severe nutrient deficiencies, muscle wasting, and health risks without sustainable fat loss or lean mass preservation.
7
Moderately effective for fat loss with reasonable lean mass preservation when protein intake is adequate.
Energy Balance ⓘ
2
Relies on unproven, harmful methods and lacks sustainable calorie control mechanisms.
6
Provides structured calorie control on fasting days but may struggle with satiety, consistency, and flexibility for varied goals.
Lean Mass ⓘ
3
Severely restricts protein and energy intake, risking significant muscle catabolism during caloric deficit.
7
Moderately supports lean mass retention when protein intake is adequate and energy balance is maintained.
Athletic Support ⓘ
1
Severely restricts energy and nutrients, compromising performance, recovery, and long-term sustainability.
6
May support energy and recovery if well-managed but risks underfueling and nutrient gaps without strict adherence.
Weight Loss ⓘ
1
Promotes severe health risks, ethical concerns, and unsustainable weight loss with no scientific support for long-term fat reduction.
7
Promotes moderate calorie deficit with flexible eating patterns but lacks robust evidence for sustained fat loss compared to other structured diets.
To discover how we evaluate diets based on Overall Health, Nutrient Density, Practicality, Taste, and other critical parameters, Explore Our Comprehensive Ranking System and detailed methodology. This will help you make informed decisions tailored to your specific goals and needs.