Total Rating
1.0
out of 10
6.4
out of 10
Metabolic Health ⓘ
1
Severe calorie restriction and parasitic consumption disrupt metabolic homeostasis, elevate inflammation, and compromise cardiometabolic function.
7
Improves insulin sensitivity and lipid profiles but shows variable effects on inflammation and long-term metabolic sustainability.
Micronutrients ⓘ
1
Relies on parasitic consumption leading to systemic micronutrient deficiencies and severe health risks.
5
May lead to chronic deficiencies in B12, iron, and other nutrients if not paired with nutrient-dense foods.
Nutrient Density ⓘ
1
Relies on a parasitic organism with negligible nutrient density and no beneficial phytonutrients.
6
Provides moderate nutrient density when paired with whole foods but lacks inherent diversity and bioavailability optimization compared to plant-based diets.
Overall Health ⓘ
1
Poses severe health risks, including parasitic infection and malnutrition, with no credible evidence supporting long-term wellness.
7
Offers moderate benefits for metabolic health and disease prevention but lacks comprehensive long-term evidence across diverse populations.
Sustainability ⓘ
1
It is biologically unsustainable, ethically indefensible, and practically unfeasible for long-term adherence.
7
Offers moderate flexibility and accessibility but may challenge adherence due to fasting periods and potential social or psychological stress.
Lifestyle Fit ⓘ
1
Causes severe social isolation, impracticality, and health risks incompatible with real-world lifestyles.
7
Offers moderate flexibility for social and travel scenarios but requires careful scheduling to align with daily routines.
Practicality ⓘ
1
Requires consumption of non-typical, inaccessible, and dangerous organisms with no real-world feasibility.
8
Offers flexible meal timing without requiring specialized foods, equipment, or complex planning, making it broadly accessible and adaptable to most lifestyles.
Appetite Control ⓘ
1
Relies on parasitic consumption, lacks essential nutrients, and induces chronic hunger with no sustainable satiety mechanisms.
7
Moderately effective in reducing hunger through fasting-induced hormonal changes but depends on nutrient balance and individual adherence.
Fat Quality ⓘ
1
Relies on parasitic consumption and lacks essential healthy fats, promoting harmful fat intake.
7
Encourages mindful eating but depends on individual fat choices for optimal quality.
Fiber Intake ⓘ
1
Provides negligible fiber and prioritizes harmful parasitic consumption over nutritional benefits.
5
Provides variable fiber intake depending on eating window choices, often lacking sufficient diversity and nutrient density.
Gut Health ⓘ
1
Severely compromises gut health through pathogenic risks, nutrient deficiencies, and lack of microbiome-supporting components.
5
Limited support for gut microbiome diversity and digestive tolerance, with mixed evidence on long-term benefits.
Hormonal Support ⓘ
1
It is a harmful, unscientific diet that disrupts hormonal balance through extreme caloric restriction and nutrient deficiencies.
6
Moderately supports insulin sensitivity and appetite regulation but may disrupt cortisol and sex hormones with improper implementation.
Macro Balance ⓘ
1
It promotes severe nutritional deficiencies, health risks, and lacks functional macronutrient balance.
6
Allows adaptable macro ratios but lacks inherent structure to ensure balanced intake across diverse dietary needs.
Protein Quality ⓘ
1
Provides negligible high-quality protein with severe health risks and inadequate amino acid balance.
5
Provides adequate protein sufficiency but relies on incomplete plant sources with lower digestibility and amino acid balance.
Taste ⓘ
1
The diet involves consuming a parasite with a strong, unpalatable taste and texture, leading to severe dissatisfaction and poor adherence.
6
Offers flexibility for flavorful meals but lacks inherent structure to ensure consistent palatability or variety.
Body Composition ⓘ
1
It causes severe nutrient deficiencies, muscle wasting, and health risks without sustainable fat loss or lean mass preservation.
7
Effectively supports fat loss while preserving lean mass when protein and training are optimized, but risks muscle loss without strict adherence to nutrient intake and resistance exercise.
Energy Balance ⓘ
2
Relies on unproven, harmful methods and lacks sustainable calorie control mechanisms.
7
Moderately effective for calorie control but lacks inherent structure to ensure consistent energy balance without external guidance.
Lean Mass ⓘ
3
Severely restricts protein and energy intake, risking significant muscle catabolism during caloric deficit.
6
Moderate effectiveness in preserving lean mass when protein intake and energy availability are adequately managed during fasting periods.
Athletic Support ⓘ
1
Severely restricts energy and nutrients, compromising performance, recovery, and long-term sustainability.
6
May support athletic performance if calorie and nutrient needs are met, but risks underfueling and impaired recovery without careful planning.
Weight Loss ⓘ
1
Promotes severe health risks, ethical concerns, and unsustainable weight loss with no scientific support for long-term fat reduction.
7
Promotes moderate calorie deficit and fat loss with reasonable sustainability but risks metabolic adaptation and variable long-term adherence.
To discover how we evaluate diets based on Overall Health, Nutrient Density, Practicality, Taste, and other critical parameters, Explore Our Comprehensive Ranking System and detailed methodology. This will help you make informed decisions tailored to your specific goals and needs.