Wigmore Diet vs Atkins Diet

Total Rating
5.2
out of 10
5.7
out of 10
Metabolic Health
5
Limited evidence supports consistent improvements in metabolic markers compared to balanced dietary patterns.
7
Moderately improves blood sugar and lipid markers but may elevate LDL and inflammation risks.
Micronutrients
4
Lacks reliable coverage of critical micronutrients like B12 and iodine without fortification or supplementation.
5
Provides adequate protein and fat but risks deficiencies in fiber, vitamin C, and certain minerals due to restricted plant foods.
Nutrient Density
6
Provides moderate nutrient density through whole plant foods but lacks phytonutrient diversity and may rely on processed items.
5
Relies heavily on calorie-dense, low-nutrient foods with limited phytonutrient diversity.
Overall Health
6
May improve cardiovascular markers but risks nutrient deficiencies without supplementation.
6
Offers short-term metabolic benefits but risks nutrient deficiencies and cardiovascular concerns with long-term adherence.
Sustainability
4
Requires strict food restrictions and limited flexibility, reducing long-term adherence potential.
6
Moderate sustainability due to strict initial phases and potential for social and psychological challenges, but offers flexibility in later stages.
Lifestyle Fit
4
Struggles with social integration and travel flexibility, limiting real-world adherence.
5
Limited flexibility in social settings and travel, requiring significant planning and adherence to restrictive food choices.
Practicality
6
Requires moderate affordability and accessibility but may demand significant meal planning and preparation effort compared to flexible diets.
6
Requires significant planning, specialty foods, and strict meal structure, limiting accessibility and affordability for many.
Appetite Control
5
Provides moderate fiber but may lack sufficient protein and stable macronutrient balance, risking hunger and cravings.
7
Provides adequate protein and fat for satiety but may induce initial carb cravings and require strict adherence to maintain appetite control.
Fat Quality
6
Relies on ALA without sufficient EPA/DHA, limiting omega-3 benefits despite whole-food fat sources.
6
Prioritizes saturated fats and omega-6 over unsaturated fats, risking cardiovascular and inflammatory risks.
Fiber Intake
7
Provides adequate fiber quantity from whole plant foods but lacks diversity in fiber types and evidence of specific health outcomes.
3
Severely restricts high-fiber plant foods, leading to inadequate fiber quantity and diversity.
Gut Health
6
Provides moderate fiber variety but lacks fermented foods and evidence of microbiome diversity improvements.
4
Limited fiber and prebiotic intake may hinder microbiome diversity and digestive tolerance.
Hormonal Support
6
Provides moderate hormonal support through fiber and antioxidants but may lack sufficient micronutrient density for optimal hormone regulation.
5
Limited micronutrient diversity and potential sex hormone imbalances due to high saturated fat and restricted food groups.
Macro Balance
6
Provides adequate protein and fiber but may lack flexibility and balance in fat intake for diverse needs.
6
Provides adequate protein and fat but risks metabolic rigidity and reduced carbohydrate flexibility without clear evidence-based justification.
Protein Quality
6
Provides adequate but suboptimal protein quality due to reliance on plant sources with incomplete amino acid profiles and lower digestibility.
8
Provides high-quality animal proteins with adequate amino acids and digestibility, but may lack optimal distribution and micronutrient balance in restrictive phases.
Taste
5
Limited flavor variety and potential for monotony in strict plant-based adherence.
6
Offers flavorful proteins and fats but may lack variety and adaptability due to carb restrictions.
Body Composition
5
Limited protein adequacy and potential lean mass compromise in strict plant-based framework.
7
Promotes fat loss with moderate lean mass preservation but risks muscle loss if protein intake is insufficient.
Energy Balance
5
Limited structure for calorie control but may support satiety through high fiber and volume.
6
Provides moderate calorie control through low-carb structure but lacks flexibility for surplus and may induce binge cycles.
Lean Mass
4
Limited protein quality and energy density may hinder muscle retention during caloric restriction.
6
Moderately supports lean mass preservation during weight loss but may compromise muscle retention due to high fat intake and potential energy deficits.
Athletic Support
5
Provides adequate macronutrients but lacks robust evidence for performance enhancement and may risk deficiencies without careful planning.
5
Provides adequate protein and fat but lacks sufficient carbohydrates for optimal energy and recovery in most athletic contexts.
Weight Loss
6
May support moderate weight loss through calorie deficit but lacks robust long-term evidence for sustained fat loss and adherence.
6
Promotes initial weight loss but lacks long-term sustainability and may lead to metabolic adaptation and weight regain.

To discover how we evaluate diets based on Overall Health, Nutrient Density, Practicality, Taste, and other critical parameters, Explore Our Comprehensive Ranking System and detailed methodology. This will help you make informed decisions tailored to your specific goals and needs.